Interested in Goodis V.United Artists Television Inc? On this page, we have collected links for you, where you will receive the most necessary information about Goodis V.United Artists Television Inc.


Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc., 278 F. Supp ...

    https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/278/122/1441821/
    Defendant United Artists, the present holder of all rights thus granted by Goodis to Warner under the December 20, 1945 agreement, is the supplier and distributor of the motion picture film series known as "The Fugitive," which is broadcast for one hour each week over the television network of defendant American Broadcasting Company, Inc., pursuant to a license from United Artists.

425 F2d 397 Goodis v. United Artists Television Inc ...

    https://openjurist.org/425/f2d/397/goodis-v-united-artists-television-inc
    Samuel D. GOODIS and William Goodis as Executors of the Estate of David Goodis, Deceased, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED ARTISTS TELEVISION, INC. and American Broadcasting Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 33. Docket 32717. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued September 19, 1969. Decided March 9, 1970.

Samuel D. Goodis and William Goodis as Executors of the ...

    https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/289823/samuel-d-goodis-and-william-goodis-as-executors-of-the-estate-of-david/
    United Artists produced a television film series, 'The Fugitive,' which was broadcast in weekly installments by defendant American Broadcasting Co. The series enjoyed considerable popularity on television, and early in 1965 Goodis instituted this action claiming $500,000 damages for …

David Goodis - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Goodis
    The Goodis estate appealed. In 1970, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case for trial. The decision is reported at Goodis v. United Artists Television, …Genre: Noir fiction, crime fiction

Fordham Law Review

    http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2044&context=flr
    Goodis' name. Following its publication in book form, Warner Brothers pro-duced Dark Passage as a movie, which was shown in theaters and on televi-sion. Warner Brothers then assigned its contract rights to defendant United Artists, which produced a film series based on Dark Passage entitled "The

David Goodis - Infogalactic: the planetary knowledge core

    https://infogalactic.com/info/David_Goodis
    The Goodis estate appealed. In 1970, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case for trial. The decision is reported at Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc., 425 F.2d 397 (2nd Cir. 1970). The court wrote, "We unanimously conclude that where a magazine has purchased the ...

Neva, Inc. v. Christian Duplications Intern., Inc., 743 F ...

    https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/743/1533/2593699/
    In Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc., 425 F.2d 397 (2d Cir.1970), the Court ameliorated the harsh effect of the indivisibility theory under some circumstances, which are applicable in the present case. Goodis, the author of the novel "Dark Passage," made arrangements with a publisher for his book to be printed in April, 1946.

Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Dumas, 831 F. Supp. 295 (S.D ...

    https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/831/295/1802372/
    Sep 09, 1993 · The doctrine of indivisibility was severely limited in this circuit by the decision in Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc., 425 F.2d 397 (2d Cir.1970). In that case, the court reversed the district court which had granted summary judgment upon the ground that the work at issue had fallen into the public domain when first publication with notice came after the author had sold the motion picture …

Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates, 345 F. Supp. 108 ...

    https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1891375/walt-disney-productions-v-air-pirates/
    Whalen & Martell, Inc., 220 F. 359 (S.D.N.Y.1914). In each of those cases, the Court found that the drawings, or graphic depictions, were sufficiently distinctive and defined to be protectible. ... Goodis v. United Artists Television, Inc., 425 F.2d 397, 406 (2nd Cir. 1970), a fair analysis of the opinion precludes either conclusion.

We hope you have found all the information you need about Goodis V.United Artists Television Inc through the links above.


Previous -------- Next

Related Pages